Some things in life are certain. Like for example the fact that on November 22, 1963 President John F. Kennedy was shot twice while riding through downtown Dallas in his presidential convoy. Other things can be a bit more hazy. While Lee Harvey Oswald was accused of killing him and an official investigation declared him to be the lone assassin, it seems that a majority of people even today (70% in fact) are not buying it. Was there another gunman? Did the CIA want revenge for the Bay of Pigs? Were mobsters upset that his brother was cracking down on organized crime? Perhaps the world will never know.
Which conspiracy theory is most likely true about the JFK assassination?
You no longer have to say conspiracy theory. It is possible to know exactly what happened during the shooting.
I like to start the introduction to this story by showing a few witnesses. What witnesses say or write PROVES NOTHING but it does give hints to what actually happened during the shooting. For example, when a complex investigation is done into an airplane crash, for example, first you determine the best scenario based on evidence and then compare it to what witnesses say happened. When they match BINGO! In the JFK "mystery", the government's and media's stories do not in MANY cases match what the witnesses say happened.
Let's listen to one witness:
Although not clear at first what Patricia meant, at the end of this video she says first shot then a pause then BAM-BAM.
Ok, remember this proves NOTHING but it is interesting, isn't it? Listen to another witness:
Patsy Paschall says POW - pause - POW-POW
There are DOZENS of additional JFK assassination witnesses who say the last two shots were fired a split second apart. Again, this PROVES NOTHING but remember, we are looking for evidence that indicates what happened during the shooting.
CBS news answered the question of what did the witnesses hear when they interviewed SIX witnesses. Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite left their viewers believing there was no coherent pattern of witnesses/shot pattern. When you listen to this interview, you'll notice ONE more witness says the last two shots were fired a split second apart. But two additional witnesses say they heard FOUR shots but their description of shot order was not broadcast for those two witnesses. In other interviews, these TWO witnesses who said they heard four shots ALSO said two of the shots were fired very close together. Walter Cronkite then says nothing to see here when actually three of the six witnesses indicated they heard two closely spaced shots.
CBS said don't listen to the "ear" witnesses, what the witnesses say they heard is worthless. The US government concluded the BANG-BANG witnesses heard ECHOES, not two separate shots. Is their a way to figure out what really happened?
Turns out that during the shooting a microphone was keyed on a motorcycle and the sounds on that police radio channel were recorded at the police station. Audio experts hired by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) reviewed the police radio recording and determined that sounds on the recording indicated multiple shots were fired. WARNING: The only people who have reviewed the recording and are considered audio experts said they found evidence of shots. There are NUMEROUS other reviewers (who have no prior experience reviewing data like this) have concluded that the sounds of gunfire were NOT recorded by the police radio. What is the right answer?
As you look at the time between shots according to the analysis by audio experts, you will notice there was (after the first volley of three shots) 4.8 seconds of pause then BANG-BANG, two shots 0.7 seconds apart. There is another way to determine the time between shots, obviously if the times are the same that means the audio experts were right!
.
Looking at the Zapruder film of the assassination, the time between shots can be determined by counting the number of film frames between times we can identify shots. For example, immediately after Gov. Connally emerges from behind the Stemmon's Freeway sign, you can see him BEGIN to react to what almost everyone believes was a shot. The beginning of his movement starts at Zapruder film frame 224. Another time we can definitely identify when a shot was fired was frame 313, the time when President Kennedy was shot in the head. The film speed of Zapruder's camera was measured at 18.3 frames per second.
Time between JFK head shot and Connally first reaction to a shot= (313 - 224)/18.3 = 4.8 seconds. That matches the time between shots #3 and #4 in the audio analysis, then we have shots #4 and #5 separated by 0.7 seconds. What happened in the Zapruder film 0.7 seconds AFTER President Kennedy is shot in the head?
As you look at the Zapruder film that has been computer stabilized, you first see President Kennedy hit hit in the head at frame 313 then you see Gov Connally violently thrown forward. 0.7 seconds is about Zapruder frame 325 which if you look at the individual frames, you will see Gov Connally start to bend over forward as the bullet hits him in the back. Connally says in this interview that he is bent over forward when he was shot in the back. In this interview, that is what Connally says happened.
But there's a big problem if you listen to this interview. Connally says the bullet hit him in the back and bent him over forward and AFTER THAT A SHOT HIT PRESIDENT KENNEDY IN THE HEAD. If you look again at the GIF of JFK being shot in the head and then Connally being bent over, you'll notice Gov. Connally is facing forward. Connally had no idea when JFK was shot in the head, he said that because in other interviews he said the ballistic "experts" argued with him. In other words Connally was coached to say JFK was shot in the head AFTER he was shot in the back.
So what else is consistent with the audio evidence and the Zapruder film? It turn out the shot that hit President Kennedy in the head (shot #4) was fired from the grassy knoll per the audio evidence and shot #5, the shot that hit Connally in the back was fired from the Texas School Book Depository.
If you look at the table of shots that match the most probable microphone, you'll notice that there are probably three shots fired from the Texas School Book Depository (shots #1, #3 and #5). Shot #4 was fired from the grassy knoll. The analysis of shot #2 is far too complicated to be presented here but if you search for the subject, you will find other places I have explained the shot sequence.
The most probable microphone from shot #1 to shot #5 is in linear order going around the corner from Houston Street on to Elm Street exactly as the motorcycle had to have traveled during the shooting.
The US government's position is that John Connally was shot in the back much earlier than President Kennedy was shot in the head. As you look at John Connally seconds AFTER THE US GOVERNMENT SAID HE WAS SHOT IN THE BACK:
do you see any blood on his shirt?
Does John Connally look like he has a severe chest wound about the size of a baseball?
Is John Connally bent over?
The answer to these simple questions is NO. Which means the US government's position and explanations are obviously wrong.
Starting here and studying echo correlation analysis and other information, you will be able to understand how the US government lied to hide the truth from Americans. The people behind the assassination must remain hidden per our government's actions.
The truth will rock this country even after 50 years of lies and deceit.
No comments:
Post a Comment